The Network Stack Debate: When to Mix Vendors (And When to Go All-In)
Quick Definition: A network stack is the collection of switches, firewalls, wireless gear, routing, and management tools that keep an organization connected. Choosing between a single-vendor or mixed-vendor stack comes down to balancing simplicity, performance, security, and long-term flexibility.
In my experience, IT teams all face the same strategic question: should we build everything around one vendor or mix and match the best tools from several? There’s no right answer, and anyone who claims otherwise hasn’t lived through a messy version update or firewall outage.
The reality is that both approaches can work brilliantly, or crash spectacularly, depending on several factors.
In this article, we'll break down the debate from a practical standpoint. We’ll define what a network stack is, outline when a single-vendor approach makes life easier, and explain when mixing vendors delivers better results.
Next, we'll highlight how vendors like Aruba and Fortinet fit into the conversation. We’ll also look at the risks, the decision criteria that matter, and the kind of training that sets IT teams up for success.
What is a Network Stack?
A network stack is the full set of infrastructure components that keep your organization connected. At its core, it typically includes:
Switches
Wireless access points
Routing components
Security integrations and automation frameworks
A well-designed network stack isn’t just a hardware list—it dictates how quickly you can deploy new sites, how efficiently you troubleshoot outages, and how strong your security posture really is. There are two general types of network stacks:
A single-vendor network stack means all (or nearly all) of these pieces come from the same vendor. Picture a full Cisco stack or an all-Aruba environment: one ecosystem, one philosophy, one support contract.
A mixed-vendor stack combines components from multiple vendors to get the strongest product in each category. A common example today is pairing Aruba switches and APs with Fortinet firewalls. This combo leverages Aruba’s networking strengths with Fortinet’s security dominance.
Both strategies work; however, they serve different priorities.
When a Single-Vendor Network Stack Makes Sense
Plenty of organizations choose one vendor and never look back. In many environments, that’s the smart move. Here’s why.
1. Simplified Management
In multi-vendor networks, even basic troubleshooting can require hopping between three to five different dashboards, each with different alert logic and log formats. With a single vendor, you get one source of truth and incident response becomes a lot less like digital hide-and-seek.That streamlines all sorts of things, like:
Configuration
Monitoring
Troubleshooting
Auditing
Patching cycles
You also avoid the “who’s actually responsible for this” confusion when things break. A single support contract means fewer headaches and less finger-pointing.
2. Tighter Integration
A unified ecosystem allows for features that work seamlessly together:
Coordinated security policies
Automatic discovery and provisioning
End-to-end visibility
Cleaner automation workflows
This tight coupling is invaluable in distributed environments. Also, it's perfect for shops that want deep security integration without custom engineering.
3. Vendor Incentives and Roadmap Alignment
Stacking your chips with one vendor often unlocks:
Better discounts on hardware bundles
Lower support costs
Licensing efficiencies
Predictable lifecycle and upgrade paths
For budget-conscious teams, those incentives can swing the decision fast. And when you trust a vendor’s roadmap, staying all-in can provide long-term stability.
When Mixing Vendors Can Be the Smarter Play
Single-vendor stacks aren’t the default choice anymore. Increasingly, IT teams are mixing vendors to get stronger performance or better economics.
1. Best-of-Breed Performance
No vendor dominates every category. Fortinet’s firewalls are stellar. Aruba’s switching and wireless stack is rock solid. Palo Alto excels in advanced threat detection. Cisco owns the legacy enterprise ecosystem.
Mixing vendors lets you cherry-pick the strongest product for each layer.
A classic best-of-breed example: FortiGate firewalls + Aruba switches and APs.
With that combo, you get Fortinet’s top-tier security engine without giving up Aruba’s reliability.
2. Avoiding Vendor Lock-In
Vendor lock-in can bite hard when licensing models shift. Plenty of teams have woken up to unexpected seat-based pricing or mandatory subscription bundles. A mixed environment keeps your options open. You can:
Replace components without re-architecting the entire network
Pivot toward better technology when the market evolves
Avoid being dependent on one vendor’s licensing model
IT leaders who’ve been burned by sudden subscription hikes or end-of-support surprises know how valuable this flexibility can be.
3. Cost Efficiency
Combining premium and budget-friendly components is often a tactical financial move. Maybe you want high-end security but don’t need premium switching for every closet. Or you want enterprise-grade wireless but can live with mid-range firewalls at branch sites. Mixing vendors lets you invest where it matters and save where it doesn’t.
Aruba vs. Fortinet: Where Do They Fit in the Debate?
Aruba and Fortinet sit right at the center of the mixed-vendor conversation, and for good reason: they excel in different domains.
Aruba Strengths
Enterprise switching and corporate-wide networking
Best-in-class wireless performance
ClearPass and Central for strong identity/management
Clean UI and well-documented automation workflows
Aruba is the go-to choice for organizations seeking high-quality access-layer infrastructure.
Fortinet Strengths
Top-notch firewalls
Integrated security fabric
Strong SD-WAN capabilities
Mature threat intelligence ecosystem
Fortinet is security-first. They build firewalls that anchor an entire security posture.
Why Pair Them?
Like spaghetti and meatballs, Aruba and Fortinet complement each other:
Aruba handles the access side flawlessly.
Fortinet locks down perimeter and internal segmentation.
Both offer reasonable pricing, solid support, and mature management tools.
Plenty of IT teams adopt this combo because it delivers premium performance without the cost of a full Cisco stack.
How Does Cisco Fit In?
Cisco remains the heavyweight for fully integrated, end-to-end networking. Many organizations choose an all-Cisco stack because:
Their ops teams already know Cisco
They want lifecycle uniformity
They rely heavily on Cisco DNA Center or Meraki
Procurement incentives are substantial at scale
Sole Cisco is not without its drawbacks. It has a premium price and sometimes over-complexity. That’s why the Aruba + Fortinet ecosystem continues to gain ground. The combo yields strong performance with a more flexible cost model.
What are the Risks of Mixing Networking Vendors?
Mixed environments offer upside, but you need to understand the tradeoffs.
1. Compatibility Issues
Different vendors don’t always play nicely. For example, some vendors interpret LLDP-MED or PoE profiles slightly differently. Suddenly your VoIP phones won’t auto-provision, or APs power-throttle without warning—two issues that never appear in a single-vendor lab environment. Common pain points can include:
VLAN behavior differences
Inconsistent LLDP/PoE implementation
Firmware patch timing causing unexpected behavior
Security features that don’t integrate cleanly
These usually aren’t showstoppers, but they do require planning and testing.
2. Support Gaps
Mixed-vendor troubleshooting can get complicated. Many times, the conversations devolves into the blame game:
“It’s not our switch; it’s their firewall.”
“The APs aren’t the issue, it’s the routing stack.”
If you're running cross-vendor configurations, document them well and expect longer troubleshooting cycles.
3. More Training Required
Every vendor ecosystem has its own way of doing things—its own UI quirks, its own CLI commands, its own automation tools, and its own approach to logging and telemetry. When you mix vendors, your team has to learn all of them, usually:
UI
CLI
Configuration syntax
Automation tools
Logs and telemetry
If you don’t plan for that overhead, you risk outages taking longer to resolve, onboarding slowing down, and a handful of people becoming “the only one who knows how X works,” which becomes its own point of failure.
How Do I Decide?
The right approach depends on your business priorities, not vendor marketing. Here's how to make the right decision for your organization.
1. Tie the Decision to Core Priorities
Ask which matters more:
Lowest total cost of ownership? A single vendor might win.
Top-tier security? Consider Fortinet.
Premium wireless and switching? Aruba stands out.
Maximum flexibility? Mixed-vendor strategy.
Fast deployment and simple management? A single-vendor approach usually simplifies operations.
To make this concrete, map the decision to your real workflows. Look at the tasks your team performs daily, such as provisioning users, troubleshooting wireless, pushing firewall rules, and choose the architecture that makes those tasks easier, not harder. You’ll quickly see whether simplicity, performance, or flexibility matters most.
2. Run a Pilot or Proof of Concept
Don't redesign your network on theory alone. Instead, validate these criteria:
Interoperability
Performance under load
Logging and visibility
Automation hooks
SD-WAN or segmentation behavior
Keep the POC small but realistic. Use actual traffic patterns, real authentication flows, and real monitoring tools. This is where you catch the surprises like quirky VLAN behavior, clunky UI workflows, or automation features that don’t quite work as advertised. A focused, two-to-four-week pilot can save months of rework later.
3. Invest in Training
Training shouldn’t be an afterthought. Decide upfront whether your team can support the architecture you choose and budget time for keeping skills current. Mixed-vendor stacks often require cross-training and more thorough documentation, while single-vendor stacks allow teams to specialize more deeply. Whichever approach you choose, make sure your engineers can operate it confidently on day one.
Relevant training options include:
Well-trained engineers can make either strategy reliable and maintainable.
Conclusion
There’s no universal rule for choosing between a single-vendor network stack and a mixed-vendor solution. Both paths have clear advantages and real risks. What matters is aligning your choice with your business priorities. Take into account cost, performance, scalability, security, and operational simplicity.
A single-vendor stack brings streamlined management and tighter integration. A mixed approach gives you flexibility and the freedom to choose the best tool for each job. Vendors like Aruba and Fortinet highlight that balance perfectly. Aruba excels in networking, the other in security, and together they form a compelling alternative to traditional monolithic stacks like Cisco.
The smartest move is to test your assumptions, invest in training, and make a decision that you can support long-term. If you want to build the skills to manage either approach effectively, CBT Nuggets offers training paths for Aruba, Fortinet, and Cisco networking. That way, you have the expertise to design and operate whatever stack makes the most sense for your organization.
Want to try a CBT Nuggets course? Get a free 7-day trial.
delivered to your inbox.
By submitting this form you agree to receive marketing emails from CBT Nuggets and that you have read, understood and are able to consent to our privacy policy.