Cisco CCNA ICND2 640-816

Routing Protocols: Distance Vector vs. Link State

by Jeremy Cioara

Start your 7-day free trial today.

This video is only available to subscribers.

A free trial includes:

  • Unlimited 24/7 access to our entire IT training video library.
  • Ability to train on the go with our mobile website and iOS/Android apps.
  • Note-taking, bookmarking, speed control, and closed captioning features.
Video Title Duration

Review: Rebuilding the Small Office Network, Part 1

Review: Rebuilding the Small Office Network, Part 2

Review: Rebuilding the Small Office Network, Part 3

Switch VLANs: Understanding VLANs

Switch VLANs: Understanding Trunks and VTP

Switch VLANs: Configuring VLANs and VTP, Part 1

Switch VLANs: Configuring VLANs and VTP, Part 2

Switch STP: Understanding the Spanning-Tree Protocol

Switch STP: Configuring Basic STP

Switch STP: Enhancements to STP

General Switching: Troubleshooting and Security Best Practices

Subnetting: Understanding VLSM

Routing Protocols: Distance Vector vs. Link State

00:00:00 - Now we'll begin our next major section of technology, which is routing
00:00:05 - protocols at the ICND2 level. Back in ICND1,
00:00:08 - all we really discussed was RIP because that's the basic
00:00:13 - routing protocol you can use to get a small network running.
00:00:16 - As we move into ICND2, we'll move in to some of the more
00:00:20 - advanced protocols such as OSPF and EIGRP. But
00:00:24 - before we begin, we need to understand some foundation concepts
00:00:28 - and hit a little review from ICND1 as we discuss distance
00:00:32 - vector versus link state routing protocols. This is a big
00:00:37 - class difference of routing protocols. Distance vector was what
00:00:40 - we saw on the ICND1, and now we're going to move into link
00:00:43 - state in ICND2.
00:00:45 - We'll first look at what distance vector routing protocols are
00:00:48 - all about and talk about some of their drawbacks.
00:00:54 - When we were in ICND1, we talked about RIP, and we
00:00:58 - said this is what it does, but we really didn't see the dark
00:01:02 - side of the RIP protocol. That's what we'll look at as we see the loop
00:01:05 - prevention mechanisms. We'll then move into the link state routing
00:01:09 - protocols and what they're all about.
00:01:12 - We'll first start off with a little bit of review from the ICDN 1
00:01:15 - world, as we talk about the two umbrellas of routing protocols
00:01:20 - that exist: distance vector and link state. These two umbrellas
00:01:25 - really mark a big divide between the styles of routing protocols,
00:01:29 - and the best way I can compare them is to talk about my first
00:01:32 - car. My first car was a 1982 Volkswagen Rabbit diesel model.
00:01:40 - Now, nowadays, I look back and I think, man, I wish I had that car because
00:01:44 - gas prices are so high, and I think I got around 50 miles
00:01:46 - to the gallon. It was insane. But back when I was 16 years
00:01:51 - old and in high school, I didn't appreciate the car. I thought,
00:01:55 - this car is not a babe magnet, because that's, that's
00:02:00 - you know, admittedly, that's all you're really looking for at the high
00:02:03 - school-age, is just the cool car. And that car lasted me for years.
00:02:09 - As a matter of fact, I sold it when I had 200 and
00:02:11 - 200,000 miles on it, and it was still running. I never
00:02:15 - changed the oil; I just put gas and I never did any maintenance
00:02:19 - at all. It just kind of went. The drawback to the Volkswagen Rabbit,
00:02:24 - besides the babe magnet factor, was the speed. I timed
00:02:30 - it once. You know to a high school male
00:02:35 - person, as myself, the 0 to 60 time of your car is very
00:02:40 - important - to see how fast you can move. And I timed it, and that
00:02:44 - car got 0 to 60 in 42 seconds. I still remember
00:02:49 - it; to this day I thought, how horrible! But that's what distance vector
00:02:54 - routing protocols are all about. They're extremely easy to configure.
00:02:58 - Meaning, just like my car, it didn't really take much to get
00:03:01 - in there. Although, I had to learn to drive stick shift and what
00:03:03 - glow plugs were all about. You just kind of turn them on, and they work
00:03:07 - and you don't need to maintain them - they just keep running. The
00:03:10 - problem with them is they're not very fast, and they don't
00:03:14 - have many features. The two examples of distance vector routing
00:03:18 - protocols are RIP and IGRP. The RIP protocol we set
00:03:22 - up in ICND1. IGRP is gone. CISCO has officially
00:03:29 - discontinued support for IGRP, it's not even in the newer IOS
00:03:33 - versions. That's because nobody really used it.
00:03:37 - They moved on to link state. Now, that is the Dodge Viper,
00:03:41 - the screaming fast car that takes just a ton of cost
00:03:47 - to get running, meaning a lot more knowledge to run that car than just
00:03:51 - a Volkswagen Rabbit, and there's a lot of maintenance and tuning and tweaking
00:03:54 - that has to go into it. And in the same sense, with link state routing protocols
00:03:59 - they're very difficult to configure. As a matter of fact, we're
00:04:02 - going to get into the OSPF protocol and talk about configuring
00:04:06 - and we'll even set it up, but to really fully understand OSPF
00:04:12 - that's what the CCNP courses are all about. The BSCI
00:04:15 - focuses tons of information on OSPF that expands on what
00:04:21 - we're going to lay as the foundation here. So they are feature-riffic;
00:04:24 - they have a lot of stuff that they're able to do and a lot
00:04:27 - of speed criteria that they can handle. And the two examples
00:04:31 - are OSPF and IS-IS. IS-IS was the routing
00:04:36 - protocol for the OSI protocol. A lot of people just think OSI
00:04:41 - was a model, but there is an OSI protocol that is out there
00:04:44 - and it's even better than TCP/IP, but not many people
00:04:47 - use it.
00:04:49 - Now down at the bottom, you see the HYBRID and this is the Dodge
00:04:52 - Viper Rabbit if you will. It's the best of both worlds, really
00:04:56 - easy to configure but gives you all the features of a link state
00:05:00 - protocol. The Achilles' heel of this hybrid routing protocol
00:05:05 - is that it is proprietary, and the one example of it is EIGRP.
00:05:09 - CISCO made it and only CISCO runs it, so you have to have CISCO
00:05:14 - routers everywhere to support that protocol.
00:05:17 - Let's first focus on distance vector routing protocols in their
00:05:20 - simplicity and in such a way that we can see some of the weaknesses
00:05:25 - that were not exposed in ICND 1. Distance vector routing
00:05:30 - protocols by nature send their entire routing table at specific
00:05:34 - intervals. The one protocol that's left, which is RIP,
00:05:37 - sends its entire routing table once every 30 seconds. So
00:05:41 - you can think of it as - imagine, imagine yourself standing
00:05:45 - in front of a big room of people,
00:05:48 - and you step up to the microphone every 30 seconds and
00:05:51 - say, "Hello everybody in this room, I know about
00:05:56 - 192.168.1.0,2.0,3.0,4.0." And then you go and
00:06:00 - take a seat and wait 26 more seconds and
00:06:03 - walk back up to the microphone, (it's been that 30 second interval), and you
00:06:06 - say, "Hello everybody, I know about 192.168.1.0,2.0,3.0,4.0."
00:06:10 - And so on, and then you sit back down. That's
00:06:13 - exactly what RIP is doing. It's broadcasting or multicasting,
00:06:17 - depending on the version you're using, to the entire network once
00:06:21 - every 30 seconds to let them know what it knows about.
00:06:24 - So if we're running RIP down here, I have
00:06:28 - a interval once every 30 seconds, I'm saying, hello everyone
00:06:32 - out both interfaces, I know about 192.168.1.0,2.0,3.0 and 4.0.
00:06:36 - Now, this router over here gets it, and says, oh
00:06:41 - great, well I knew about two, but I didn't know about one, so I'll add that
00:06:44 - to my routing table. It's a little review in, in, from ICND 1, how routing
00:06:49 - tables are built. And so, before long all these routers know
00:06:52 - about their routing table. Now keep in mind, the reason that
00:06:56 - RIP sends updates every 30 seconds
00:07:00 - is not just because these routers might have missed something,
00:07:04 - it's because its update system is the only keepalive it has.
00:07:09 - Meaning, if this router stops hearing updates it's going to
00:07:12 - realize, oh well, this router over here, (we'll call them router C),
00:07:16 - is dead. So, I will see if I have backup routes to reach
00:07:20 - the 192.168.1.0 network that router C was
00:07:24 - being used to support. So, those updates are keepalives, and
00:07:28 - in their simplicity, RIP or distance vector protocols
00:07:33 - have looping issues. Here's what that means:
00:07:38 - Let's imagine that router C over here has, you know, sent out
00:07:44 - its update. It's doing the normal RIP thing, and, you know, over
00:07:48 - here is the building that it's supporting, we'll say it's in Arizona,
00:07:52 - and that's the network. And the IT admin in Arizona comes
00:07:57 - in. It's seven in the morning, you know, he just happened to beat rush-hour
00:08:00 - so he came in a little early. And that, that, the administrator is
00:08:03 - walking up into the IT room. Just got his cup of coffee, you know, (slurp), sipping the
00:08:08 - coffee and just you know, trying to wake up. Network admins
00:08:13 - are not morning people. They are creatures of the night because that's
00:08:16 - when most of your maintenance Windows are happening. And he
00:08:19 - walks up, (trot,trot,trot,trot,trot), sees this dangling cable,
00:08:24 - but sees it too late. Trips over this Ethernet cable connecting
00:08:28 - the router to the switch and the rest of the network over here.
00:08:32 - And you know, severs the cable, (snap!), and sparks are flying
00:08:35 - and fire extinguishers. It's not that bad. But, either way,
00:08:40 - router C loses its connection to the 192.168.1.0
00:08:44 - network. Now, unfortunately, router C just sent an
00:08:48 - update two seconds ago, so it's got 28 more seconds to go
00:08:53 - before it sends out its next update and lets everybody know
00:08:56 - that the network is down. Well, here's where the problem comes
00:08:59 - in. Router B just happened to send out its last update five seconds
00:09:04 - or sorry I should say, 25 seconds ago, so it's got five seconds
00:09:09 - left until its next update. Four..three..two..one.. "Hello everybody,
00:09:15 - this is router B now, I know about 192.168.4.0,3.0,2.0
00:09:19 - and 1.0, (chrk,chrk,chrk,chrk,chrk). That update hits router C. Router
00:09:25 - C gets it and goes, "That's, that's fantastic. Router B, you must
00:09:29 - have been reading my mind because I just lost my ow- my own
00:09:33 - connection to 192.168.1.0. It just went down.
00:09:37 - So, what I'll do is I'll point to you as the next hop address.
00:09:43 - We'll say router B is 192.168.2.2 over
00:09:46 - here. So router C will point to router B as the next hop
00:09:50 - address to now reach 192.168.1.0.
00:09:54 - Now, you and I are looking at this diagram going, why are you doing
00:09:59 - that router C, what are you thinking? Don't, no, don't do that.
00:10:02 - Router B was using you to get to the 192.168.1.0 network.
00:10:05 - Why, why would you try and use router B? But, unfortunately,
00:10:10 - distance vector routing protocols aren't that smart, so router
00:10:13 - C points to router B to reach the 192.168.1.0.
00:10:16 - network, and 28 seconds later sends
00:10:21 - out its own update saying, Hey, I now have a new path to get
00:10:24 - to 192.168.1.0. It is through router B.
00:10:29 - That's, that's the way that I go, and it's two hops away from
00:10:34 - me. Now, let's check this out. Before, router C was directly
00:10:39 - connected, so it was zero hops - that's RIP's metric, it's, it's hop count.
00:10:44 - So it was directly connected zero hops. So for router B, it was one hop, meaning
00:10:50 - router B would go- ta,ta,ta,ta,ta- hop, router C and I'm there. That, that
00:10:54 - was the process router B would use, but now router B sent
00:10:58 - an update to router C saying
00:11:01 - I have a link to 192.168.1.0, and it's one hop
00:11:05 - away from me. Router C got that update and says, well, if it's one
00:11:08 - away from you, and I go through you to get there, it must be
00:11:12 - two hops away from me.
00:11:14 - Does that make sense? Because router C thinks, I hop through router B
00:11:17 - and then go wherever router B goes and then I'm there. So router B
00:11:21 - gets the update, right? Says, Ok, now I am hearing about
00:11:25 - 192.168.1.0 from C. And C is
00:11:28 - now claiming that it's two hops away. Router B is scratching its
00:11:32 - head and goes, well, that's funny. It used to be zero hops
00:11:36 - away from router C, but now it's two, so, well, I guess if it's
00:11:40 - two hops away from router B, it must be three hops away from
00:11:43 - me, because I use router- oops, I meant router C- if it's two hops from router
00:11:48 - C, it must be three from me, because I use router C to get
00:11:51 - there. That's odd. And it passes that update to router A over here,
00:11:56 - and router A gets it and says, well, that's funny, it used to be two hops
00:12:00 - for me, but I guess now that it's three hops from you, it must be four hops from me. And
00:12:04 - this system goes round and round and round and round and round.
00:12:08 - And these hop counts keep going up, higher and higher
00:12:10 - and higher. This is known, its symptom is technically called
00:12:14 - a countdown to infinity. Now, you and I know you'll never reach
00:12:18 - infinity, and that's why we call this an official routing loop.
00:12:22 - This is something that distance vector routing protocols, such
00:12:25 - as RIP, can experience.
00:12:28 - Thankfully, built-in to CISCO routers are five loop prevention
00:12:33 - mechanisms to keep what I just showed you from happening. Now
00:12:38 - this will prevent every routing loop that you can have. So
00:12:41 - that leads to the question, or begs the question, why do we need to
00:12:45 - know about these? Well, the reason why is they do help stop routing
00:12:49 - loops, but they can also cause problems. And there may be times
00:12:53 - where you have to turn one or two of them off. So, the first
00:12:58 - loop prevention mechanism that we have is a maximum distance.
00:13:01 - With RIP, the maximum distance that's defined is 16,
00:13:05 - I'm gonna grab my pen here, 16 hops. So, once a RIP network is 16
00:13:12 - hops away, it is then considered dead. So, if we had a loop
00:13:17 - that did happen in router.. Let me put my letters back here C, B and A
00:13:20 - were passing that 192.168.1.0 network
00:13:24 - all around the network, that would keep going until they reach
00:13:27 - 16 hops, and then whichever router got it at the 16 hop level would
00:13:31 - say, oops, that route is now dead; it's too far away. That also tells
00:13:36 - you that RIP can only be used on small networks, because there
00:13:39 - are some networks that have links that are farther than 16
00:13:42 - hops from each other.
00:13:45 - The second one that you see is route poisoning. Route poisoning
00:13:50 - kind of integrates with the maximum distance. And what it does
00:13:54 - is advertise that the network is down immediately. So it seems
00:13:59 - kind of funny, but routing protocols built-in themselves do
00:14:03 - not have a way of saying, this route is down.
00:14:07 - That's not what they're designed to do. Routing protocols are
00:14:10 - designed to tell each other what routes are up. So route poisoning
00:14:14 - had to be specially engineered to say, Router C, as soon as
00:14:18 - this network goes down, poison it, kill it. And the way it kills
00:14:22 - it is by setting it to a maximum hop count. You know it kind of
00:14:26 - triggers another rule. These, these rules integrate tightly
00:14:29 - together. So as soon as that network admin trips over the wire,
00:14:32 - over here in Arizona, it
00:14:35 - poisons the route and says, well, this is now 16 hops away, and the
00:14:39 - next update that goes out will advertise that. So router B
00:14:42 - gets it and says, oh, well that's the maximum, so that route must
00:14:45 - be dead. Now, the third one is just logical. One of the reasons
00:14:51 - this whole system happened, was router C sent an update two
00:14:55 - seconds ago, right? And so when this network went down it had
00:14:58 - to wait 28 more seconds before the next update went
00:15:02 - out. And with that delay, router B was able to send an update
00:15:05 - and say, hey, router C, I've got a route to 1.0 and that caused
00:15:09 - the whole problem. So triggered updates integrates with route poisoning, which integrates
00:15:14 - with max distances, which says when that network admin trips
00:15:17 - over the wire, immediately, immediately negate all timers.
00:15:22 - All bets are off at that point. You've had a major network change.
00:15:26 - So at this point, we will trigger an update; overrule that 28
00:15:30 - seconds you were going to wait, router C, and as soon as you
00:15:33 - see the network go down, send a poisoned route, telling router
00:15:36 - B the network is down.
00:15:40 - Split horizon, split horizon is one of the most difficult to
00:15:45 - remember, but one of the most critical ones, and one of the ones
00:15:49 - that causes the most problems when, when you are using these
00:15:52 - loop prevention mechanisms. If there's one that you're going to disable
00:15:55 - it's probably split horizon. And when we get to some of the advanced
00:15:59 - WAN networks I'll bring this back up. What split horizon does
00:16:03 - is tell routers: Do not send updates back in the same direction
00:16:08 - you receive them on networks that are being advertised. Let
00:16:13 - me explain that in plain English.
00:16:17 - Let's say that you and I met on the street. And you came up
00:16:22 - to me and said, "Hi Jeremy, my name is Mike," and I said, "Hi Mike." And,
00:16:26 - and you said, "Jeremy, I have brown eyes."
00:16:32 - Now, would I ever tell Mike that he has brown eyes? No, because that
00:16:37 - would create a people loop. Meaning, if, if Mike and I were to
00:16:41 - meet on the street, and Mike said, "I have brown eyes," and told
00:16:45 - me about that, I would never tell Mike he has brown eyes, for many
00:16:48 - reasons, but primarily because I don't want to start a people
00:16:52 - loop because I would say, "Well, yeah, you have brown eyes," and Mike would say,
00:16:55 - "Yeah, I do," and I would say, "No, you have brown eyes." And we'd just keep going around
00:17:00 - and around until both of us, Mike and I, died. So split horizon
00:17:04 - is a rule that says, do not tell routers about routes they told you
00:17:09 - about. So when router C says, Hey router B, I know about 192.168.1.0/24.
00:17:13 - Router B is now banned
00:17:18 - from telling router C about that route. Brilliant! Because
00:17:22 - that's how this whole thing started in the first place, right? Router C
00:17:26 - heard about a route that it told router B about, and that's
00:17:30 - what caused router C to point to router B, and started the whole
00:17:32 - loop from the beginning.
00:17:34 - Now, you'll see when we get to some of the advanced WAN
00:17:37 - network diagrams, why this can cause some problems, especially
00:17:41 - in networks like frame relay. But for now, split horizon is definitely
00:17:46 - a good thing.
00:17:47 - Last, but not least, is the hold down timer; your best and worst
00:17:53 - friend when it comes to loop prevention.
00:17:57 - Hold down timers says, I will not believe any other updates
00:18:02 - about this route for x amount of time. Here's what I mean: When
00:18:07 - this network goes down, router C sends a triggered update
00:18:11 - saying, it's down. Router B receives that and says, well, that's, that's
00:18:16 - a big change. Let me immediately tell router A about it, and
00:18:19 - both of them will set a hold down timer. This is my little
00:18:23 - clock. Now, that hold down timer can vary depending on what protocol
00:18:27 - you're using, but what it does is it says, I will not accept
00:18:31 - any more updates about this for a certain amount of time. The
00:18:35 - reason that this is in place, is because of flapping interfaces.
00:18:41 - If you've never heard of a flapping interface before, what
00:18:44 - it is, is it's an interface that goes up and down, and up and down
00:18:47 - and up and down, and up and down; a million times a second. Or maybe
00:18:50 - not that many, but a lot. It's just constantly going up and down. It's
00:18:54 - caused by a bad network cable. It could be a bad connector, you
00:18:58 - know it's not plugged in quite all the way, but it's in most of the way.
00:19:01 - Or, it could just be a network interface card, a network card that's going
00:19:05 - bad. Now, the problem is, is we introduce this system of triggered
00:19:09 - updates. Well, if we've got that, that can destroy a network when
00:19:15 - combined with flapping updates. Because, or flapping interface,
00:19:18 - because when this goes up immediately router C says, hey, router B, it's up.
00:19:21 - Router B is like, hey, router A, it's up. Oh, nope, it's down. Down, down. And everybody's
00:19:26 - adding and removing that route 1,000 times a second from
00:19:29 - their routing table. All the routers on your network has their
00:19:32 - processor utilization shoot through the roof. So, what hold down
00:19:37 - timers do is say, ok, you told me it's down, I will not believe
00:19:41 - anything else about that. Now, that's great in the sense that
00:19:46 - you've prevented flapping interfaces, but it's bad in the sense
00:19:49 - that you've got this IT admin, right, who tripped over that
00:19:53 - cable, and he sees it. He goes, "Oh! I can't believe I did
00:19:57 - that." And, you know, plugs the cable back in. Well, immediately,
00:20:00 - router C is going to say, oh, ok, it's back up, but router B is not going
00:20:04 - to believe that. It's going to say, sorry, you've told me it's down,
00:20:08 - and I'm going to believe it's down for x more seconds. I think
00:20:13 - by default on a CISCO router, it's 180 seconds.
00:20:16 - 180 seconds! Can you believe that? That's a huge amount
00:20:21 - of downtime just because someone unplugged a cable
00:20:24 - and then tried to plug it back in. So, all of those five things
00:20:29 - are loop prevention mechanisms, and they are all drawbacks of
00:20:33 - using the RIP routing protocol.
00:20:36 - Now, let's change our focus to the link state routing protocols,
00:20:40 - which have no loops because they have a completely different
00:20:43 - system of handling routes and route updates. First off, link
00:20:48 - state routing protocols form neighbor relationships
00:20:52 - with each other, rather than just sending broadcast or
00:20:55 - multipackets, multicast packets to everyone. So, for example, I gave
00:20:59 - you the example of a distance vector routing protocol being
00:21:03 - like you walking in front of a group of people into a microphone
00:21:06 - and saying, hey, everyone, I know about these networks. Well, in
00:21:10 - a link state routing protocol, if it was the same situation, you
00:21:14 - would stand up on the stage and then you'd go, you know what,
00:21:17 - Let's, let's not do this. Let's walk down. And you would find
00:21:20 - the first person in that crowd that you would want to exchange
00:21:23 - route with, routes with and you would say, "Hi, my name is Jeremy. What's
00:21:26 - yours?" And they would say, "Hi, my name is, my name is Michael." And
00:21:30 - you would say, "Well, Michael", it's funny, I'm doing this odd system
00:21:35 - where I'm saying you, but it's really me. So, how about I flip it to me. I
00:21:38 - would say, "Hi Michael, I know about these routes," and Michael
00:21:42 - would say, "Great! Let me put them in my routing table. Jeremy, I know
00:21:45 - about these routes." And I'd say, "Great! Let me add those to my
00:21:49 - routing table." And then, we just look at each other, and I would
00:21:52 - say, "Hi Michael." And he'd look back and say, "Hi."
00:21:56 - And then I'd wait, and then I'd say, "Hi Michael." And he would say, "Hi." And
00:22:01 - we keep doing that all day long, "hi, hi, hi". That's actually the
00:22:05 - technical name of a protocol called the hello protocol. OSPF
00:22:10 - uses this protocol known as hello and it sends it much
00:22:14 - more frequently than RIP to make sure that the router is still
00:22:18 - online. Since I am just sending a single message to another
00:22:22 - router, I'm just saying "hello", I can send that much more often
00:22:26 - than RIP could when it was sending broadcasts and multicasts
00:22:29 - packets because it bothered the whole network. If you were to tune RIP down
00:22:32 - to send those more often, you would cause some major network
00:22:35 - problems. So,
00:22:38 - OSPF and other link state routing protocols use "hello".
00:22:42 - After the initial routing tables are exchanged, routers just
00:22:45 - send small, event-based updates. Meaning, with distance factor, we
00:22:50 - sent the whole routing table every 30 seconds. With link state routing
00:22:54 - protocols, I only send an update when I need to send an update.
00:22:59 - When something changes, I would say, "Hi Michael, 192.168.1.0
00:23:03 - just went down." And you go, "Oh that, that's great! I'll remove
00:23:07 - that from my table." And then I just look at him and go, "Hi Michael."
00:23:10 - Nothing more; I don't need to send any more updates, unlike
00:23:14 - RIP. So there are only two link state routing protocols
00:23:18 - that exist today. That is OSPF, that's what we're going to
00:23:21 - talk about here, and IS-IS, which is covered more in the
00:23:25 - CCNP curriculum.
00:23:28 - So, to wrap up this conceptual video on routing protocols, let's
00:23:32 - look at the advantages and disadvantages of using a link state
00:23:37 - protocol. Advantage: they are much faster to converge. They can
00:23:41 - find problems on the network and repair them much faster than
00:23:45 - distance vector. And the reason why, is they're saying hello
00:23:48 - more often so they can detect a failure much, much quicker. There's
00:23:53 - no routing loops because the routers have a complete road map of
00:23:57 - the network, which we'll see as we dig deeper into OSPF. So
00:24:01 - they don't, they don't ever get confused. They don't ever need
00:24:04 - loop prevention mechanisms. If you've got a road map, there's no chance
00:24:08 - that you're going in the wrong direction. Unless you don't know how to read
00:24:10 - a map.
00:24:11 - Finally, it forces your, you to design your network correctly.
00:24:16 - And I have that as both an advantage and, you can see, a disadvantage
00:24:22 - that's because link state routing protocols do require a solid
00:24:25 - network design. Meaning, if you've designed your network poorly and
00:24:29 - just assigned IP addresses where you wanted to assign them; put a network here,
00:24:33 - put in a network there. No real design in mind. Well, link state
00:24:37 - routing protocols are really not going to be an advantage to
00:24:40 - you, at that point, because they will cause worse problems on
00:24:43 - your network than if you had used distance vector.
00:24:46 - So, some of the disadvantages is: number one, they do consume
00:24:49 - more resources on your router. They'll use more processor and
00:24:53 - more memory utilization because they're simply more complex. They
00:24:57 - do require a solid network design, and I'm, I'm skating around that one
00:25:01 - for now, the deep definition of that, because as we look
00:25:04 - at OSPF specifically, I'll show you what a good design looks like. Finally,
00:25:09 - link state routing protocols have technical complexity. There's
00:25:14 - a lot to them and there's a lot to know about them if you want
00:25:17 - to use them efficiently in your network. So, there is a lot
00:25:21 - more education necessary to use link state protocols.
00:25:25 - We've now taken our first step back into the routing protocol
00:25:29 - world, since the ICND1 videos. As we've looked at distance
00:25:33 - vector versus link state. So, let me summarize, we looked at the two
00:25:38 - classes or umbrellas of routing protocols. All in all, distance
00:25:42 - vector, you can think of as easy to configure and featureless. Meaning,
00:25:46 - they don't have that many features, whereas link state you can
00:25:50 - think of as complex and require a lot of tuning, but they do
00:25:54 - have just about every feature you would expect from a routing
00:25:57 - protocol. So that's the difference. We then looked at the
00:26:01 - loop prevention mechanisms of distance vector, which are really
00:26:05 - a Band-aid for some of the problems introduced with the routing
00:26:08 - protocol that broadcasts in all directions everything it knows
00:26:11 - every 30 seconds. Finally, we looked at the advantages and
00:26:15 - disadvantages, and what the big difference is when using a link
00:26:20 - state routing protocol. I hope this has been informative for you
00:26:23 - and I'd like to thank you for viewing.

Routing Protocols: OSPF Concepts

Routing Protocols: OSPF Configuration and Troubleshooting

Routing Protocols: EIGRP Concepts and Configuration

Access-Lists: The Rules of the ACL

Access-Lists: Configuring ACLs

Access-Lists: Configuring ACLs, Part 2

NAT: Understanding the Three Styles of NAT

NAT: Command-line NAT Configuration

WAN Connections: Concepts of VPN Technology

WAN Connections: Implementing PPP Authentication

WAN Connections: Understanding Frame Relay

WAN Connections: Configuring Frame Relay

IPv6: Understanding Basic Concepts and Addressing

IPv6: Configuring, Routing, and Interoperating

Certification: Some Last Words for Test Takers

Advanced TCP/IP: Working with Binary

Advanced TCP/IP: IP Subnetting, Part 1

Advanced TCP/IP: IP Subnetting, Part 2

Advanced TCP/IP: IP Subnetting, Part 3

Please help us improve by sharing your feedback on training courses and videos. For customer service questions, please contact our support team. The views expressed in comments reflect those of the author and not of CBT Nuggets. We reserve the right to remove comments that do not adhere to our community standards.

comments powered by Disqus

Course Features

Speed Control

Play videos at a faster or slower pace.

Bookmarks

Pick up where you left off watching a video.

Notes

Jot down information to refer back to at a later time.

Closed Captions

Follow what the trainers are saying with ease.

Offline Training

Our mobile apps offer the ability to download videos and train anytime, anywhere offline.

Accountability Coaching

Develop and maintain a study plan with assistance from coaches.
Jeremy Cioara

Jeremy Cioara

CBT Nuggets Trainer

Certifications:
Cisco CCNA, CCDA, CCNA Security, CCNA Voice, CCNP, CCSP, CCVP, CCDP, CCIE R&S; Amazon Web Services CSA; Microsoft MCP, MCSE, Novell CNA, CNE; CompTIA A+, Network+, iNet+

Area Of Expertise:
Cisco network administration and development. Author or coauthor of numerous books, including: CCNA Voice 640-461 Official Cert Guide; CCNA Voice Official Exam Certification Guide (640-460 IIUC); CCENT Exam Prep (Exam 640-822); CCNA Exam Cram (Exam 640-802) 3rd Edition; and CCNA Voice 640-461 Official Cert Guide.


Stay Connected

Get the latest updates on the subjects you choose.


  © 2014 CBT Nuggets. All rights reserved. Licensing Agreement | Billing Agreement | Privacy Policy | RSS